Diagnosis and Treatment of Inguinal Hernias after Surgical Treatment of Prostate Cancer, Current State of the Problem

(1) Purpose: To compare and evaluate the immediate and long-term results of the use of various hernioplasties for the treatment of inguinal hernias after surgical treatment of prostate cancer; to determine the possibility of performing transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty and total extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernioplasty in patients with inguinal hernia during surgical treatment of prostate cancer. (2) Method: This study is a clinical analytical prospective study, without the use of randomization. The study included 220 patients with inguinal hernia, who were randomly divided into two groups (group A (n = 100) and group B (n = 120)). Patients in group A received eTEP, and those in group B received TAPP. The end points of the study were the results associated with the operation itself and the prognosis of the disease in the two groups. (3) Results: Group A: five patients had a scrotal hematoma, in 10 cases nosocomial pneumonia or infectious complications from the postoperative wound. The overall rate of early postoperative complications was 15%. In group B, the following postoperative complications were reported: one case of intestinal injury, six cases of acute urinary retention, eight cases of scrotal hematoma and 12 cases of nosocomial pneumonia or infectious complications from the postoperative wound were admitted. The overall incidence of early postoperative complications was 22.5%. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (chi(2) (3) = 2.54, p > 0.05). (4) Conclusion: During the analysis of the obtained results, no statistically significant difference was found in the duration of hospitalization, the volume of blood loss, the severity of pain syndrome, postoperative complication incidence and recurrence incidence (p > 0.05); however, the comparison groups differed in the duration of the operation: the operation time in group A was much longer compared to group B (p < 0.05).