Comparison of STOPS and SNAPPE-II in Predicting Neonatal Survival at Hospital Discharge: A Prospective, Multicentric, Observational Study

Objective To compare SNAPPE-II and STOPS admission severity scores in neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with a gestational age of ≥ 33 wk. Methods In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, the sickness scoring was done on all the neonates at 12 h after admission to the NICUs. The scoring systems were compared by the area under the curve (AUC) on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Results A total of 669 neonates with gestational age ≥ 33 wk (mortality rate: 2.4%), who were admitted to five participating NICUs within 24 h of birth, were included. Both SNAPPE-II and STOPS had the good discriminatory and predictive ability for mortality with AUCs of 0.965 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94–0.98] and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.99), respectively. The STOPS scoring system with a cutoff score ≥ 4 on the ROC curve had 85% accuracy, whereas the SNAPPE-II cutoff score ≥ 33 on the ROC curve had 94% accuracy in predicting mortality. Conclusion In infants with the gestational age of ≥ 33 wk, SNAPPE-II and STOPS showed similar predictive ability, but the STOPS score, being a simpler clinical tool, might be more useful in resource-limited settings.