Diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease when applied to clinical practice

INFECTION(2022)

引用 15|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Objective To compare non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTMPD) diagnosis by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) with Bactec mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960. Methods A total of 422 patients with suspected NTMPD in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between January 2020 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed; 194 were diagnosed with NTMPD. The diagnostic performance of mNGS and MGIT 960 for NTMPD was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under curve (AUCs) were compared. Results The sensitivity of mNGS in NTMPD diagnosis was 81.4% and higher than that of MGIT 960 (53.6%). The specificity of mNGS in NTMPD diagnosis was 97.8%, similar to that of MGIT 960 (100%). The sensitivity of combined mNGS and MGIT 960 in NTMPD diagnosis was 91.8%. The sensitivity of mNGS for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), pulmonary puncture tissue fluid, and sputum was 84.8%, 80.6%, and 77.5%, respectively; all were higher than that of MGIT 960 ( P < 0.05). The AUC of mNGS and MGIT 960 was 0.897 and 0.768, respectively. The AUC of mNGS were BALF (0.916), pulmonary puncture tissue fluid (0.903), and sputum (0.870). Conclusion The sensitivity of mNGS was superior to that of Bactec MGIT 960; the specificity in NTMPD diagnosis was similar. mNGS shows effective performance in NTMPD diagnosis.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria,Metagenomic next-generation sequencing,Pulmonary disease,Diagnosis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要