The Detection of Prostate Cancer With Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies Is Superior With the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study. Letter.

No AccessJournal of UrologyLetters to the Editor1 Apr 2023The Detection of Prostate Cancer With Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies Is Superior With the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study. Letter.is a letter which has replyThe Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior With the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study. Reply. Richard J. Bryant, Freddie C. Hamdy, and Alastair D. Lamb Richard J. BryantRichard J. Bryant * E-mail Address: [email protected] Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Cancer Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK More articles by this author , Freddie C. HamdyFreddie C. Hamdy Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Cancer Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK More articles by this author , and Alastair D. LambAlastair D. Lamb Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Cancer Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003283AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail REFERENCES 1. . The detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies is superior with the transperineal vs the transrectal approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group multi-institutional study. J Urol. 2022; 208(4):830-837. Link, Google Scholar 2. . Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting. BJU Int. 2020; 125(2):244-252. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3. . Initial experience performing in-office ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia using the PrecisionPoint transperineal access system. Urology. 2018; 115:8-13. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4. . Transperineal prostate biopsies using local anesthesia: experience with 1,287 patients. Prostate cancer detection rate, complications and patient tolerability. J Urol. 2019; 201(6):1121-1126. Link, Google Scholar 5. . Local anaesthetic transperineal (LATP) prostate biopsy using a probe-mounted transperineal access system: a multicentre prospective outcome analysis. BJU Int. 2021; 128(3):311-318. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6. . TREXIT: initial experience with transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting in South East Asia. Asian J Androl. 2021; 23(5):543-544. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar Submitted January 11, 2023; accepted January 31, 2023; published 000. © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology9 Mar 2023The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior With the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study. Reply. Volume 209Issue 4April 2023Page: 679-679 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Richard J. Bryant Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Cancer Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK * E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Freddie C. Hamdy Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Cancer Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK More articles by this author Alastair D. Lamb Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Cancer Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK More articles by this author Expand All Submitted January 11, 2023; accepted January 31, 2023; published 000. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...