Single-port transvesical versus open simple prostatectomy: a perioperative comparative study

Objective To compare the initial perioperative outcomes of single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) patients to those of open simple prostatectomy (OSP). Patients and methods Perioperative data from 42 consecutive patients with BPH who underwent SP RASP were prospectively reviewed. Similarly, data from forty-three consecutive patients who underwent the standard OSP, were retrospectively collected. Through direct suprapubic bladder access, prostatic enucleation was performed using the prostatic capsule as a landmark. Then a complete vesicourethral mucosal advancement flap was accomplished. OSP was performed according to the standard approach. Demographics, Intra- and perioperative data were analyzed and assessed with a descriptive analysis. Results and limitations Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the preoperative median post-void residual volume, which was higher in the OSP group ( p = 0.004). The SP RASP group had less intraoperative estimated blood loss ( p < 0.001), no need for continuous bladder irrigation ( p < 0.001), and less in-hospital opioid use ( p < 0.001). Patients in the SP RASP group were discharged on postoperative day zero, compared to a median of 2 days for OSP ( p < 0.001). The median Foley catheter duration was 7 days for SP RASP, compared to a median of 10 days for OSP ( p < 0.001). SP RASP group had fewer postoperative complications, however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion SP RASP is an alternative approach in treating surgical BPH. It may offer patients less morbidity in comparison to OSP.