Evidence of Neutralizing and Non-Neutralizing Anti-Glucosaminidase Antibodies in Patients With S. Aureus Osteomyelitis and Their Association With Clinical Outcome Following Surgery in a Clinical Pilot.

osteomyelitis remains a very challenging condition; recent clinical studies have shown infection control rates following surgery/antibiotics to be ~60%. Additionally, prior efforts to produce an effective vaccine have failed, in part due to lack of knowledge of protective immunity. Previously, we demonstrated that anti-glucosaminidase (Gmd) antibodies are protective in animal models but found that only 6.7% of culture-confirmed osteomyelitis patients in the AO Clinical Priority Program (AO-CPP) Registry had basal serum levels (>10 ng/ml) of anti-Gmd at the time of surgery (baseline). We identified a small subset of patients with high levels of anti-Gmd antibodies and adverse outcomes following surgery, not explained by Ig class switching to non-functional isotypes. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that clinical cure following surgery is associated with anti-Gmd neutralizing antibodies in serum. Therefore, we first optimized an assay that quantifies recombinant Gmd lysis of the cell wall and used it to demonstrate the 50% neutralizing concentration (NC) of a humanized anti-Gmd mAb (TPH-101) to be ~15.6 μg/ml. We also demonstrated that human serum deficient in anti-Gmd antibodies can be complemented by TPH-101 to achieve the same dose-dependent Gmd neutralizing activity as purified TPH-101. Finally, we assessed the anti-Gmd physical titer and neutralizing activity in sera from 11 patients in the AO-CPP Registry, who were characterized into four groups . Group 1 patients (n=3) had high anti-Gmd physical and neutralizing titers at baseline that decreased with clinical cure of the infection over time. Group 2 patients (n=3) had undetectable anti-Gmd antibodies throughout the study and adverse outcomes. Group 3 (n=3) had high titers +/- neutralizing anti-Gmd at baseline with adverse outcomes. Group 4 (n=2) had low titers of non-neutralizing anti-Gmd at baseline with delayed high titers and adverse outcomes. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that both neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-Gmd antibodies exist in osteomyelitis patients and that screening for these antibodies could have a value for identifying patients in need of passive immunization prior to surgery. Future prospective studies to test the prognostic value of anti-Gmd antibodies to assess the potential of passive immunization with TPH-101 are warranted.