Computational complexity of hybrid interval temporal logics

Interval logics are very expressive temporal formalisms, but reasoning with them is often undecidable or has high computational complexity. As a result, a vast number of approaches limiting their expressive power—in order to obtain better computational behaviour—have been introduced. Unfortunately, due to such restrictions, interval logics often lose referentiality, that is, the capacity to refer to specific time intervals, which is crucial for temporal representation and reasoning. The computational price that needs to be paid in order to regain referentiality is not well studied and our research aims to fill this gap. In particular we study the main interval temporal logic, called the Halpern-Shoham logic, and its low complexity modifications. To regain referentiality in these modifications, we extend the language with the hybrid machinery—nominals and satisfaction operators—and classify the obtained logics according to their computational complexity. We show that such a hybridisation often makes tractable logics intractable but not undecidable. This allows us to construct hybrid interval temporal logics which are referential as well as maintain a good compromise between expressiveness and complexity; it makes them valuable formalisms for temporal knowledge representation. We also introduce a class of models which, due to a specific interplay between the interpretation of modal operators and a structure of time, makes reasoning in interval logics computationally hard even in the absence of the hybrid machinery.