A Mixed-Methods Program Evaluation of a Self-directed Learning Panel Management Curriculum in an Internal Medicine Residency Clinic

Panel management (PM) curricula in internal medicine (IM) residency programs often assign performance measures which may not address the varied interests or needs of resident-learners. To evaluate a self-directed learning (SDL)–based PM curriculum. University-based primary care practice in Burlington, Vermont. Thirty-five internal medicine residents participated. Residents completed a PM curriculum that integrated SDL, electronic health record (EHR)–driven performance feedback, mentorship, and autonomy to set learning and patient care goals. Pre/post-curricular surveys assessed EHR tool acceptability, weekly curricular surveys and post-curricular focus groups assessed resident perceptions and goals, and an interrupted time series analysis of care gap closure rates was used to compare the pre-intervention and intervention periods. Majority of residents (28–32 or 80–91%) completed the surveys and focus groups. Residents found the EHR tools acceptable and valued protected time, mentorship, and autonomy to set goals. A total of 13,313 patient visits were analyzed. There were no significant differences between rates between the pre-intervention period and the first intervention period (p=0.44). A longitudinal PM curriculum that incorporated SDL and goal setting with EHR-driven performance feedback was well-received by residents, however did not significantly impact the rate of care gap closure.