Effect of the addition of GnRH and a second prostaglandin F2α treatment on pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows submitted to an estradiol/progesterone-based timed-AI protocol

Two experiments determined whether the addition of GnRH at the beginning of an estradiol (E2)/progesterone (P4)- based synchronization protocol and/or a second dose of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) the day before P4 device removal improves pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cows. On Day 0, all cows received a CIDR-B device and 2 mg i.m. estradiol benzoate, and half received 200 μg i.m. gonadorelin acetate (GnRH). On Day 7, cows were further subdivided to receive PGF2α (500 μg i.m. cloprostenol) or no PGF2α treatment. On Day 8, CIDR-B were removed, and all cows received PGF2α, 1 mg estradiol cypionate and 400 IU eCG i.m., and an estrus detection aid. Experiment 1 was designed to evaluate the effect of treatments on follicular development from P4 device removal to ovulation, expression of estrus, time of ovulation and serum P4 concentrations. Cows (n = 76) were examined by ultrasonography and bled for serum P4 determinations every 12 h from the time of P4 device removal but were not inseminated. In Experiment 2, all cows (n = 1036) were inseminated based on estrus detection using tail-paint. Cows with >50% of the paint rubbed-off by 48 h after P4 device removal were inseminated at that time, whereas those not in estrus received 100 μg i.m. of GnRH and were inseminated 12 h later. In Experiment 1, the interval from P4 device removal to ovulation was 71.7 ± 1.5 h and did not differ among groups. However, cows that received 2 injections of PGF2α had a greater (P < 0.01) estrus rate and lower (P < 0.01) P4 concentrations at 48 h after P4 device removal than those that received 1 PGF2α (estrus rate: 86.8% vs 68.4% and P4 concentration: 0.12 ± 0.01 vs 0.36 ± 0.07, for 2 and 1 PGF2α, respectively). In Experiment 2, estrus rate was also influenced by the number of PGF2α treatments, regardless of whether cows received or did not receive GnRH on Day 0 (2 PGF2α: 84.7%, 438/517 vs 1 PGF2α: 65.7%, 341/519; P < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a GnRH treatment by number of PGF2α treatments interaction (P < 0.05) on P/AI that was attributed to greater (P < 0.05) P/AI in cows that received GnRH on Day 0 and 2 PGF2α than in the other three treatment groups (EB+1 PGF2α: 45.2%, 119/263; EB+2 PGF2α: 45.8%, 119/260; EB + GnRH + 1 PGF2α: 45.7%, 117/256 and EB + GnRH + 2 PGF2α: 57.2%, 147/257). It was concluded that the addition of GnRH on Day 0 and a second dose of PGF2α the day before P4 device removal improves P/AI in lactating dairy cows synchronized with an estradiol/P4-based protocol.