Early Performance of 'Honeycrisp' Apple Trees on Several Size-Controlling Rootstocks in the 2014 NC-140 Rootstock Trial

J. A. Cline, W. Autio,J. Clements, W. Cowgill,R. Crassweller, T. Einhorn,E. Fallahi,P. Francescatto,E. Hoover,G. Lang,J. Lordan,R. Moran, M. Muehlbauer,S. Musacchi,M. Stasiak, R. Parra Quezada,T. Robinson,S. Serra, S. Sherif, R. Wiepz, J. Zandstra

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY(2021)

引用 0|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
In 2014, a multi-year orchard experiment of apple Malus domestica (Borkh) was established at 14 locations in Canada, Mexico, and the United States using 'Honeycrisp' as the scion. Seventeen dwarf and semi-dwarf rootstock genotypes were tested, specifically: Budagovsky.10 (B.10), the Cornell-Geneva rootstocks G.11, G.202, G.214, G.30, G.41, G.890, G.935, G.969, the Malling rootstocks M.7, MM.106, and the Vineland rootstocks V.1, V.5, V.6, and V.7. The industry standard Malling rootstocks M.26 EMLA and M.9-T337 were included for comparison purposes. Tree mortality, trunk cross-sectional area, tree canopy size, amount of rootstock suckering, yield, and fruit number were measured annually. All measured parameters were influenced by location and rootstock, and the interaction of these two factors was significant. Overall, after five years and averaged over all locations, G.11 and G.41 were 6% smaller and 5% larger, respectively, than M.9-T337. G.935 and B.10 were 9% and 5% smaller, respectively, than M.26 EMLA, whereas G.214 and G.969 were 3% and 10% larger, respectively. V.1 and G.30 were 52% and 60% larger, respectively, than M.26 EMLA, whereas V.7, G.890, V.6, and V.5 were the largest genotypes in the trial, ranging from 77-95% larger than M.26 EMLA. G.202 performance was unusual and therefore was omitted from data analysis. Generally, cumulative yields per tree were greater on trees with the highest vigor. On average, 10 of the 16 rootstocks produced higher yields than M.9-T337 and M.26 EMLA; the newer rootstocks B.10, V.5, V.6, V.7 and all of the Geneva series rootstocks, with the exception of G.41, had cumulative yields that exceeded M.9-T337 and M.26 EMLA. Averaged over all locations, cumulative yield efficiency was greatest for G.935, G.214, M.9-T337, G.11, G.890, and G.969. Overall, the strong rootstock by location interaction on cumulative yield observed in this trial illustrates the importance of testing rootstocks at a regional level. These results are only reflective of the orchard establishment years; additional research must be completed before apple producers can make more informed decisions concerning rootstock selection for their orchard training systems and planting locations.
更多
查看译文
关键词
fruit weight, cumulative rootstock suckers, cumulative yield efficiency, trunk cross-sectional area
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要