Single-Centre Experience with Three Metallic Ureteric Stents (Allium URS, Memokath-051 and Resonance) for Chronic Ureteric Obstruction

Abstract Aim To evaluate efficacy of Allium URS, Memokath 051 and Resonance metallic ureteric stents as an alternative to polymer stents/nephrostomy in managing chronic ureteric obstruction (CUO). Method Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with CUO managed with Allium URS, Memokath-051 or Resonance (September 2015/July 2020). Baseline patient variables (age, gender, underlying aetiology, ASA) and stricture characteristics (length, level, continuity) were recorded. Intra- and post-operative clinical and radiological follow-up assessments at 6 weeks, 3 months and then every 6 months, as well as any emergency attendances, were reviewed for placement success, stent complications, serum creatinine, and mortality. Outcomes included placement success rate, functional stent survival, and mean renal function. Results Overall, 129 stent insertion episodes (SIEs) (Allium URS: 23, Memokath 051: 48, Resonance: 58) occurred in 76 patients (Allium URS: 16; Memokath-051: 31; Resonance: 29). Placement success was high (Allium URS: 95.7%; Memokath-051 and Resonance: both 100%). Median functional stent survival was 11.4 months for Allium URS, 5.5 months for Memokath-051 and 11.7 months for Resonance. 47.8% of Allium URS SIEs (11/23), 64.6% of Memokath-051 SIEs (31/48) and 19% of Resonance SIEs (11/58) experienced complication (most frequently obstruction followed by migration and infection). There were no complications for Resonance SIEs for benign indication. In the first year following SIE, serum creatinine ranged from +21.3% to + 46.7% for Allium URS, -7.8% to + 8.9% for Memokath-051, and -9.4% to + 27.3% for Resonance. Conclusions Allium URS, Memokath 051 and Resonance metallic ureteric stents are all viable management options of CUO. Resonance was particularly efficacious for patients with benign aetiology.