Assessment of Regulatory Compliance Testing for Vitamin D in Infant Formula-Impact of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/828

Donald L Gilliland,Brendon D Gill, Roger C Kissling,Dustin E Starkey,Harvey E Indyk, Adrienne McMahon, Arnold P Broek,Martine P van Gool, Hans M M Cruijsen,Erik J M Konings, Esther Campos-Gimenez

JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL(2022)

引用 0|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Background: Since the publication of Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPR (R)) for vitamin D in infant formula (SMPR 2011.004) by AOAC INTERNATIONAL, revised vitamin D limits have been recommended by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for infant formula and adopted in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/828. The vitamin D range introduced, 2-2.5 mu g/100 kcal, is significantly narrower than previous limits specified by Codex Standard 72-1981 and requires lower method reproducibility metrics to adequately assess regulatory compliance. The narrower limits for vitamin D present a significant challenge for current-generation reference analytical methods that comply with SMPR 2011.004. Objective: We evaluate the impact of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/828 on the demonstrated performance of AOAC Method 2016.05/ISO 20636:2018 to assess the likelihood that vitamin D results produced by the method would be found outside the EU limits when testing infant formula that is compliant as manufactured. Methods AOAC Method 2016.05/ISO 20636:2018, specifically data generated during multi-laboratory study, was used as a basis for statistical evaluation of the impact of the narrower EU vitamin D limits. Results: The review of AOAC Method 2016.05/ISO 20636:2018 method performance against the vitamin D regulatory range introduced in (EU) 2019/828 indicates methods capable of performing in alignment with SMPR 2011.004 are likely to produce results that fail to meet EU requirements. Conclusions: Our assessment illustrates the high probability that a well-manufactured product with vitamin D levels within the EU regulatory range would fail to meet the regulatory requirements due to analytical method variability when tested using fit-for-purpose methods. Further, required method performance cannot be expected with the future development of new methods. To avoid this, consideration should be given to aligning proposed regulatory limits with method performance metrics of current-generation compendial methods.
更多
查看译文
关键词
AOAC 2016.05,EU 2019/828,ISO 20636:2018,Infant Formula,SMPR 2011.004,SPIFAN,Vitamin D
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要