Evaluation of spirometry gated CT scan to measure lung volumes in emphysema patients

Introduction In emphysema patients, being evaluated for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR), accurate measurement of lung volumes is important. Total Lung Capacity (TLC) and Residual Volume (RV) are commonly measured by body-plethysmography, but can also be derived from chest computed tomography (CT). Spirometry-gated CT scanning potentially improves the agreement of CT and body-plethysmography. Objective To compare lung volumes derived from spirometry-gated CT and “breath-hold-coached” CT to the reference standard: body-plethysmography. Methods In this single centre retrospective cohort study, emphysema patients, evaluated for BLVR, underwent body-plethysmography, inspiration (TLC) and expiration (RV) CT-scan with spirometer guidance (“gated group”) or with breath-hold-coaching (“non-gated group”). Quantitative analysis was used to calculate lung volumes from the CT. Results We included 200 patients (age 62±8 years, FEV 1 29.2±8.7%, TLC 7.50±1.46 L, RV 4.54±1.07 L). The mean CT-derived TLC was 280(±340)ml lower compared to body-plethysmography in the gated group (n=100), and 590(±430)ml lower for the non-gated group (n=100) (both p<0.001). The mean CT-derived RV was 300(±470)ml higher in the gated group and 700(±720)ml higher in the non-gated group (both p<0.001). Pearson correlation factors were 0.947 for TLC gated, 0.917 for TLC non-gated, 0.823 for RV gated, 0.693 for RV non-gated, 0.539 for %RV/TLC gated and 0.204 for %RV/TLC non-gated. The differences between the gated and non-gated CT results for TLC and RV were significant for all measurements (p<0.001). Conclusion In severe COPD patients with emphysema, CT-derived lung volumes are strongly correlated to body-plethysmography lung volumes, and especially for RV, more accurate when using spirometry-gating.