Illumination Power and illumination stability v1

Nathalie Gaudreault,Steve Bagley,Rodrigo R Bammann, Fabio Barachati, Laszlo Barna, Veronika Boczonadi,Ulrike Boehm,Manel Bosch, Craig Brideau,Mariana T Carvalho, Pina Colarusso, Richard Cole, Nasser Darwish-Miranda, Sam Duwé, Frank Eismann, Orestis Faklaris, Andreas Felscher, Manfred Gonnert, David Grunwald, Marcel Kirchner, Birgit Hoffmann, Gabriel Krens, Alex J Laude, Jeffrey M LeDue,Pascal Lorentz,Miso Mitkovski, Michael S Nelson, Britta Schroth-Diez,Stanley Schwartz, Sathya Srinivasan, Roland Thuenauer,Tse-Luen Wee, Kees van der Oord, Chloë van Oostende-Triplet,Roland Nitschke, Laurent Gelman

semanticscholar(2021)

引用 1|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
To obtain accurate, reproducible, and interpretable data when conducting imaging experiments, it is critical to consider external factors affecting data acquisition at various steps of the experimental workflow. Illumination power and stability represent two critical factors, especially when comparing fluorescence intensities between images during a time-lapse experiment or experiments performed at different times or on other microscopes. The fluorescence signal can be generated by different types of light sources. These light sources and their coupling elements (e.g., fibers) can display varying performances over time as they age, move, or as environmental conditions change. Unfortunately, microscope users can often only set illumination power as a percentage of its maximal output and, may therefore, not be aware of potential performance changes. It is important to recognize that a set percentage will not always yield the same illumination power in Watts at the objective over the course of an experiment, not to mention between days or systems. This means that selecting for example 10% output may lead to different experimental results over time and will not necessarily be comparable to outputs obtained from other lasers or microscopes, even those of the very same model. If you are responsible for system maintenance, routinely measuring the illumination power, stability, and linearity over time can help you detect issues that affect the integrity of the system and thus the reproducibility of an experiment. This protocol describes how to measure the stability and linearity of the illumination power using calibrated external power sensors. This protocol is at the moment intended for confocal systems (raster scanning and spinning disks), but will be extended later to other imaging modalities. It represents the collective experience of 60 imaging scientists. Measurements made by our working group with this protocol are available in a public database, which will be updated with further contributions from the community.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要