Remote Infection Control Assessments of US Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic, April to June 2020

Maroya Spalding Walters, Christopher Prestel, Lucy Fike, Nijika Shrivastwa,Janet Glowicz, Isaac Benowitz,Sandra Bulens, Emily Curren, Hannah Dupont,Perrine Marcenac, Garrett Mahon, Anne Moorman, Abimbola Ogundimu,Lauren M. Weil,David Kuhar, Ronda Cochran,Melissa Schaefer,Kara Jacobs Slifka,Alexander Kallen,Joseph F. Perz

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association(2022)

引用 1|浏览9
暂无评分
摘要
Background Nursing homes (NHs) provide care in a congregate setting for residents at high risk of severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. In spring 2020, NHs were implementing new guidance to minimize SARS-CoV-2 spread among residents and staff. Objective To assess whether telephone and video-based infection control assessment and response (TeleICAR) strategies could efficiently assess NH preparedness and help resolve gaps. Design We incorporated Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 guidance for NH into an assessment tool covering 6 domains: visitor restrictions; health care personnel COVID-19 training; resident education, monitoring, screening, and cohorting; personal protective equipment supply; core infection prevention and control (IPC); and communication to public health. We performed TeleICAR consultations on behalf of health departments. Adherence to each element was documented and recommendations provided to the facility. Setting and Participants Health department–referred NHs that agreed to TeleICAR consultation. Methods We assessed overall numbers and proportions of NH that had not implemented each infection control element (gap) and proportion of NH that reported making ≥1 change in practice following the assessment. Results During April 13 to June 12, 2020, we completed TeleICAR consultations in 629 NHs across 19 states. Overall, 524 (83%) had ≥1 implementation gap identified; the median number of gaps was 2 (interquartile range: 1-4). The domains with the greatest number of facilities with gaps were core IPC practices (428/625; 68%) and COVID-19 education, monitoring, screening, and cohorting of residents (291/620; 47%). Conclusions and Implications TeleICAR was an alternative to onsite infection control assessments that enabled public health to efficiently reach NHs across the United States early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Assessments identified widespread gaps in core IPC practices that put residents and staff at risk of infection. TeleICAR is an important strategy that leverages infection control expertise and can be useful in future efforts to improve NH IPC.
更多
查看译文
关键词
SARS-CoV-2,nursing home,infection control
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要