Comparison of Different Biologics for Treating Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Network Analysis

Background Several promising clinical trials have demonstrated the effects of type 2 biologics compared with placebos in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, there are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between the biologics. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of different biologics used for the treatment of CRSwNP. Methods We systematically identified RCTs investigating the effects of biologics for CRSwNP. Primary outcomes were nasal polyp score (NPS), nasal congestion severity, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, loss of smell severity, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test score, and the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score. Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was used to compare the outcome parameters. Results Seven RCTs (Bachert 2017, OSTRO, POLYP 1, POLYP 2, SINUS-24, SINUS-52, and SYNAPSE) involving 1913 patients and 4 biologics (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab) were included for ITC. Dupilumab presented better effects in decreasing NPS and nasal congestion severity compared with the other 3 biologics at 24 weeks of the treatment and at the end of follow-up (more than 48 weeks). Benralizumab was the least effective in reducing nasal congestion severity and SNOT-22 score at 24 weeks. No significant differences were observed between the effects of the other biologics. Conclusion Our current findings suggest that dupilumab exhibits the best efficacy and safety for the treatment of CRSwNP.