A Single Institution Experience of Induction FOLFIRINOX Followed by Surgery vs Consolidative Radiation for Borderline and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Background: Induction FOLFIRINOX is increasingly used for borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but the benefit of surgery versus consolidative radiation in the FOLFIRINOX era is not well defined. Single institution experiences have included FOLFIRINOX with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, lack a uniform comparator group to surgery, or are limited to surgical patients after FOLFIRINOX. No prospective clinical trials have assessed surgery versus radiation. Therefore, our primary objective was to identify the long-term survival impact of surgery versus radiation for BR and LA unresectable PDAC treated with induction FOLFIRINOX. Methods: We performed a single center retrospective review of BR and LA PDAC treated with FOLFIRINOX from 2010 - 2018. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on receipt of surgery versus consolidative radiotherapy. Findings: We identified 101 BR and LA PDAC patients treated with induction FOLFIRINOX; 40 underwent surgery and 61 received consolidative radiotherapy. The surgery group was 28/40 (70%) BR and 12/40 (30%) LA, while consolidative radiotherapy was 18/61 (30%) BR and 43/61 (70%) LA. The R0 resection rate was 100% for surgery and 18/40 (45%) received radiation prior to surgery. Median overall survival (OS) for surgery was 42·3 months (95% CI 24·6 - not reached) compared to a median OS of 19·6 months (95% CI 16·3 - 24·6) with consolidative radiotherapy(p = 0·0001). On multivariate analysis, surgery was associated with improved OS (HR 0·35, 95% CI 0·17 - 0·71, p=0·004). Interpretation: Surgery after induction FOLFIRINOX is feasible and has a clinically meaningful survival benefit in BR and LA PDAC compared to induction FOLFIRINOX followed by consolidative radiotherapy. Funding Statement: This research was not supported by any funding. Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the Yale University institutional review board.