Timing of Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms

Background Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) with peritoneal involvement is a common indication for cytoreductive surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). With peritoneal recurrence, patients are increasingly being offered repeat CRS/HIPECs, however optimal timing for a second CRS/HIPEC remains unknown. Methods A prospectively maintained 30-year database at our high-volume HIPEC center was analyzed retrospectively for patients with LAMNs and peritoneal recurrence receiving one or two CRS/HIPECs. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, linear regression modeling, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. Results Overall, 143 patients with LAMNs who underwent CRS/HIPECs had confirmed postoperative peritoneal recurrence. Of these patients, 85 underwent one CRS/HIPEC and 58 underwent two CRS/HIPECs. The groups had significant differences in age, with younger patients more likely to undergo a second CRS/HIPEC (48.5 vs. 58.0 years; p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) for the group undergoing two CRS/HIPECs was approximately four times longer compared with the group undergoing one CRS/HIPEC (227.1 vs. 54.5 months; p < 0.0001). The time from recurrence to the second CRS/HIPEC was not significantly associated with OS from the time of the first operation. Instead, a shorter time between the first CRS/HIPEC and recurrence was significantly associated with shorter OS from the time of the first operation ( p = 0.037). Conclusion In peritoneal LAMNs with recurrence, receiving two CRS/HIPECs was associated with better OS compared with receiving one CRS/HIPEC. Longer time to recurrence was a good prognostic factor. Delay between recurrence and second CRS/HIPEC had no apparent impact on OS from the first CRS/HIPEC; thus, immediate or delayed reoperative intervention are both reasonable approaches.