Right ventricular end-systolic remodeling index on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with other functional markers in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can provide important metrics of pulmonary hypertension. In the current study, we investigated whether the CMR-derived right ventricular end-systolic remodeling index (RVESRI) could be a metric in assessing the function and hemodynamics of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Methods: A total of 64 patients (45 +/- 14 years, 37 males), including 46 patients with CTEPH and 18 patients with chronic pulmonary thromboembolism (CTE), were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent right heart catheterization and CMR within 7 days. RVESRI, right ventricular eccentricity index, right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index, right ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular cardiac output, and strain were analyzed on cine images of CMR. Hemodynamic parameters including mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac output were obtained from right heart catheterization. Results: RVESRI of all patients was 1.50 (IQR 1.26-1.90). Compared with CTE patients, RVESRI in patients with CTEPH was significantly increased (U=27.5, P<0.001). The interclass correlation coefficients of intra-observer reproducibility and inter-observer reproducibility for RVESRI measurement were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99), respectively. RVESRI positively correlated with right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (r=0.79, 0.83, 0.62, P<0.001), while it was negatively correlated with right ventricular ejection fraction (r=-0.64, P<0.001), right ventricular cardiac output (r=-0.50, P<0.001), and right ventricular eccentricity index (r=-0.81, P<0.001). RVESRI had a positive correlation with mean pulmonary arterial pressure (r=0.65, P<0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (r=0.69, P<0.001), while it was negatively correlated with cardiac output (r=-0.64, P<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that RVESRI >1.35 had a sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 83.3% in predicting mean pulmonary arterial pressure >= 25 mmHg, and its area under the curve (AUC) was 0.96 +/- 0.02. Meanwhile, the AUC of RVESRI was similar to RVEI (Z=1.635, P=0.102) and was more than the diameter of the main pulmonary artery (MPA) (Z=2.26, P=0.02) and the ratio of the MPA and ascending aorta diameter (MPA/AAo) (Z=3.826, P<0.001) in predicting mean pulmonary arterial pressure >= 25 mmHg. Conclusions: RVESRI measured on CMR is a simple and reproducible metric in assessing right ventricular function and hemodynamics in CTEPH patients.