Do smokers' harm perceptions of cigarillos differ by modified use of the tobacco product? Findings from waves 3 and 4 of the PATH study.

OBJECTIVE:The harm perceptions of individuals who smoke either blunts or the Black & Mild (B&M) brand, which is often "freaked," have seldom been investigated. Since these practices could affect users' perceived health risks of the cigarillo, this study was intended to compare such risks among cigarillo users by modified use of the tobacco product. METHOD:Adult cigarillo and blunt smokers were selected from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study for cross-sectional (Wave 4; n = 3,331) and longitudinal (Waves 3-4; n = 1,898) analyses of predictors of general and relative harm perceptions of cigarillos. Ordinal and multinomial logistic regression methods were employed for testing whether adjusted odds of perceiving cigarillo harms were greater in blunt versus cigarillo smokers. In a separate model (n = 1,258), preference for B&M cigarillos was examined as a correlate of harm perception due to the perceived health benefits of removing the inner tobacco liner. RESULTS:Cross-sectional estimates indicated that blunt smokers, mixed cigarillo/blunt smokers, and those who preferred B&M brand perceived significantly more risk than conventional cigarillo smokers. Longitudinal estimates indicated that among those who underwent a transition in use, former blunt and former cigarillo smokers had significantly greater odds of reporting an increase in perceived harm compared to new users. CONCLUSIONS:The change in blunt smokers' harm perceptions upon transitioning in blunt use suggests acknowledgment of the harm of using cigarillos in some form. Given their high perceived risk of cigarillos, blunt smokers might be receptive to replacing the tobacco product with a nontobacco wrap. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).