Guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies Balazs Aczel , Barnabas Szaszi , Gustav Nilsonne , Olmo Van den Akker , Casper J Albers , Marcel A. L. M. van Assen , Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen , Daniel Jacob Benjamin , Udo Boehm , Rotem Botvinik-Nezer , Laura Francina Bringmann , Niko Busch , Emmanuel Caruyer , Andrea Michael Cataldo , Nelson Cowan , Andrew Delios , Noah N'Djaye Nikolai van Dongen , Chris Donkin , Johnny van Doorn , Anna Dreber , Gilles Dutilh , Gary F. Egan , Morton Ann Gernsbacher , Rink Hoekstra , Sabine Hoffmann , Felix Holzmeister , Magnus Johannesson , Kai Jonas , Alexander Kindel , Michael Kirchler , Yoram Kevin Kunkels , D. Stephen Lindsay , Jan-Francois Mangin , Dora Matzke , Marcus Robert Munafo , Ben R Newell , Brian A. Nosek , Russell Poldrack , Don van Ravenzwaaij , Jörg Rieskamp , Matthew Salganik , Alexandra Sarafoglou , Tom Schonberg , Martin Schweinsberg , David Shanks , Raphael Silberzahn , Daniel J. Simons , Bobbie Spellman , Jeffrey Joseph Starns , Samuel St-Jean , Eric Luis Uhlmann , Jelte M. Wicherts , Eric-Jan Wagenmakers semanticscholar（2021）
摘要
We present consensus-based guidance for conducting and documenting multi-analyst studies. We discuss why broader adoption of the multi-analyst approach will strengthen the robustness of results and conclusions in empirical sciences.
更多 查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
