Reply to Dr. Tursi.

P G van Putten,F ter Borg, R P Adang,J J Koornstra, M J Romberg-Camps, R Timmer, A C Poen,E J Kuipers,M E van Leerdam

Endoscopy(2013)

引用 0|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
We appreciate the comments raised by Dr. Tursi. Medicolegal issues are indeed important in any field of medicine, including endoscopy. Growing health care demands and costs in all Western countries require unprecedented solutions, including selective use of resources and rescheduling of tasks. The latter includes rescheduling of tasks from registered nurses to other personnel, as well as rescheduling tasks from physicians to specialized nurses. We fully agree that this can only be done under strict legal authorization. To accomplish this, one first needs evidence that nurses can perform a task competently, adequately, and safely; hence our research as presented in Endoscopy [1]. The next step is to search for legal possibilities. In the Netherlands, for example, rules for health care professionals are set by the Individual Health Care Professionals Act (Wet BIG). This act authorizes nurses to be trained in and perform specific delegated tasks, provided the tasks are performed in accordance with the quality standards and under a prespecified level of supervision. Nurses trained and assessed to be competent to perform a specific procedure will be judged accordingly, and are personally responsible for the procedure, including its complications. Medical liability insurance for hospitals and professionals covers medical malpractice costs. However, it is the responsibility of local institutions to define these rules and responsibilities to clarify the medicolegal implications.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Clinicopathologic Analysis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要