Imageless robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA

Background and objective It is evident from the national joint registries that numbers of revision knee arthroplasty operations are rising. The aim of this article is to introduce a new robotic-assisted approach in UKA to TKA revision arthroplasty and investigate the alignment accuracy, implant component use and surgery time and to compare it to primary robotic-assisted TKA arthroplasty. Methods This retrospective, case-control study included patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA ( n = 20) and patients undergoing image-less robotic-assisted primary TKA (control group, n = 20) from 11/2018 to 07/2020. The control group was matched based on the BMI and natural alignment. Comparison of groups was based on postoperative alignment, outlier rate, tibial insert size, lateral bone resection depth, incision-to-wound closure time. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon using the same bi-cruciate stabilizing TKA system. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric t‑testing and Fisher’s exact test with a level of significance of p < 0.05. Results The two groups showed no differences in mean BMI, natural alignment ( p > 0.05) and mean overall limb alignment. No outlier was found for OLA and slope analysis. The smallest insert size (9 mm) was used in 70% of the cases in the revision group ( n = 14) and in 90% of the cases in the primary group ( n = 18, p = 0.24), distal femoral and tibial resection depth showed no statistical difference ( p > 0.05). The incision to wound closure time was longer in the revision group but showed no significant difference. Conclusion Image-less robotic-assisted revision arthroplasty from UKA to TKA showed a comparable surgery time, and alignment accuracy in comparison to primary robotic-assisted TKA. Comparable bone preservation and subsequent tibial insert size use was observed for both groups.