A Comparison of Sexual Function in Male Patients with Anorectal Malformations Between the Conventional and Laparoscopic Approaches

Aim: To compare the incidence of erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory anomalies in male patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) after treatment with the sacroperineal approach (Group S) or laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP; Group L). Methods: Male patients who underwent repair of high- or intermediate-type ARMs at our center and aged >= 15 years as of November 2020 were enrolled. Patients with intellectual disabilities or chromosomal disorders were excluded. Sacroperineal anorectoplasty has long been routinely performed at our hospital, and LAARP was introduced as a standard procedure in 2000. The medical records of the outpatient clinic were retrospectively reviewed, and questionnaires were sent in November 2020. Data regarding erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory anomalies, and associated anomalies were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: Answers were obtained from 7/22 patients in Group S (32%) and 10/17 patients in Group L (59%). Patient characteristics were similar, but the median age at the time of replying was significantly different (22 [18-29] years in Group S and 19 [15-20] years in Group L, P = .0060). None of the patients had erectile dysfunction, but 3 patients in Group S (43%) and 5 patients in Group L (50%) had ejaculatory failure, with no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: The incidence of sexual dysfunction in male patients with ARM might be higher than that in the healthy population. Patients might abscond from their follow-up visits as they age; therefore, providing patients with accurate information on this issue before puberty is essential.