How can medial support for proximal humeral fractures be achieved when positioning of regular calcar screws is challenging? Slotting and off-axis fixation strategies.

BACKGROUND:Achieving medial support for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) by regular calcar screw positioning is challenging when the humeral head is small or locking plates are placed distally, as there are unable inserted calcar screws into the humeral head. We aimed to investigate the suitability of the 2 strategies, slotting calcar screw (SCS) and off-axis calcar screw (OCS), to achieve medial support for PHFs. METHODS:Regular calcar screw (RCS), SCS, OCS, and noncalcar screw (NCS) were tested via mechanical experiments and finite element analysis (FEA), using synthetic bones for biomechanical comparisons. All PHFs treated in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2019 were reviewed. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the calcar screw fixation: RCS, SCS, and OCS. The postoperative varus collapse (neck-shaft angle changed to less than 120°) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were recorded. RESULTS:The properties of RCS, SCS, and OCS against the torsion and varus force were superior to those of NCS, whereas the stiffness of SCS, OCS, and RCS were similar. FEA predicted lower peri-screw strains in the OCS and SCS than in the RCS, indicating a lower risk of cut-out. Patients (n = 125; 75 female, 50 male) aged 55.9 ± 13.0 years were evaluated. Compared with the RCS (5/55), varus collapse incidences were not significantly higher following SCS (0/29, P = .094) or OCS (3/41, P = .756), and neither were DASH scores (P = .867 and .736, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:This study is a preliminary study demonstrating that the SCS and OCS fixation strategies could be useful alternatives when regular calcar fixation is not possible using the plate at hand.