Prevalence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis: can it be corrected at final fusion?

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL(2021)

引用 2|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Purpose To investigate the risk and predictive factors of junctional issues after conversion from Traditional growing rod (TGR) to definitive spinal fusion in Early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Methods Retrospective review of a multicenter EOS database. TGR patients who received final fusion with at least two-year follow-up were included. Proximal (PJA) and Distal junctional angles (DJA) on pre-final fusion, post-final fusion (within one year of surgery), and at latest follow-up were measured on lateral upright spinal radiographs. Differences in values among designated time points and predictive factors of junctional issues were evaluated statistically. Results Forty-six of 251 patients (28 females, 18 males and mean age at final fusion: 12 ± 2 [9–17] years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up between first postoperative measurement and latest follow-up was 49 ± 22 (24–112) months. No statistical differences in PJA and DJA values were available at pre-fusion, first post-fusion, or latest follow-up ( p = 0.827, p = 0.076). Fifty percent of patients had extension of TGR instrumentation at fusion, either proximal or distal. No factor including sex and etiology, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, major curve magnitude, PJA, and DJA at pre-fusion was found to be a predictive issue for extension of index TGR instrumentation, except the history of at least one implant-related complication during the period from index surgery to the definitive fusion. Conclusion PJA and DJA remained stable when transitioning from TGR to final posterior spinal fusion. But 50% of patients had extension of construction at fusion, either proximal or distal.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Early-onset scoliosis,Proximal junctional angle,Distal junctional angle,Extension of instrumentation,Traditional growing rod,Definitive spinal fusion
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要