Development And Validation Of A Prognostic Nomogram For Colorectal Cancer After Surgery

BACKGROUND A nomogram is a diagram that aggregates various predictive factors through multivariate regression analysis, which can be used to predict patient outcomes intuitively. Lymph node (LN) metastasis and tumor deposit (TD) conditions are two critical factors that affect the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) after surgery. At present, few effective tools have been established to predict the overall survival (OS) of CRC patients after surgery. AIM To screen out suitable risk factors and to develop a nomogram that predicts the postoperative OS of CRC patients. METHODS Data from a total of 3139 patients diagnosed with CRC who underwent surgical removal of tumors and LN resection from 2010 to 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The data were divided into a training set (n = 2092) and a validation set (n = 1047) at random. The Harrell concordance index (C-index), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the predictive performance of the N stage from the American Joint Committee Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification, LN ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to screen out the risk factors significantly correlating with OS. The construction of the nomogram was based on Cox regression analysis. The C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration curve were employed to evaluate the discrimination and prediction abilities of the model. The likelihood ratio test was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the final model to the model with the N stage alone to evaluate LN metastasis. RESULTS The predictive efficacy of the LODDS was better than that of the LNR based on the C-index, AIC values, and AUC values of the ROC curve. Seven independent predictive factors, namely, race, age at diagnosis, T stage, M stage, LODDS, TD condition, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, were included in the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for OS prediction was 0.8002 (95%CI: 0.7839-0.8165) in the training set and 0.7864 (95%CI: 0.7604-0.8124) in the validation set. The AUC values of the ROC curve predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.846, 0.841, and 0.825, respectively, in the training set and 0.823, 0.817, and 0.835, respectively, in the validation test. Great consistency between the predicted and actual observed OS for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the training set and validation set was shown in the calibration curves. The final nomogram showed a better sensitivity and specificity than the nomogram with N stage alone for evaluating LN metastasis in both the training set (-4668.0 vs -4688.3, P < 0.001) and the validation set (-1919.5 vs -1919.8, P < 0.001) through the likelihood ratio test. CONCLUSION The nomogram incorporating LODDS, TD, and other risk factors showed great predictive accuracy and better sensitivity and specificity and represents a potential tool for therapeutic decision-making.