Similarities And Differences: Comment On Chan Et Al. (2021)

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION(2021)

引用 2|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Spicer et al. (2020) reported a series of causal learning experiments in which participants appeared to learn most readily about cues when they were not certain of their causal status and proposed that their results were a consequence of participants' use of theory protection. In the present issue, Chan et al. (2021) present an alternative view, using a modification of Rescorla and Wagner's (1972) influential model of learning. Although the explanation offered by Chan et al. appears very different from that suggested by Spicer et al., there are conceptual commonalities. Here we briefly discuss the similarities and differences of the 2 approaches and agree with Chan et al.'s proposal that the best way to advance the debate will be to test situations in which the 2 theories make differing predictions.
更多
查看译文
关键词
associative learning, theory protection, prediction error, cue competition, causal learning
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要