Thinner Strut Sirolimus-Eluting BRS Versus EES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: FUTURE-II Trial

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions(2021)

引用 9|浏览17
暂无评分
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of thinner strut Firesorb (100/125 mm) sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) in patients with coronary artery disease.BACKGROUND First-generation thicker strut BRS were associated with unexpected device-related adverse outcomes at long-term follow-up.METHODS Eligible patients with 1 or 2 de novo noncomplex coronary lesions were randomized to the Firesorb BRS group or CoCr-EES group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 1-year angiographic in-segment late loss (LL), powered for noninferiority testing. The key secondary endpoint was the 1-year proportion of covered struts assessed on optical coherence tomography, powered for noninferiority and subsequent superiority testing.RESULTS A total of 433 participants from 28 Chinese centers were randomized to the Firesorb BRS group (n = 215) or CoCr-EES group (n = 218). Patient-level 1-year in-segment LL was 0.17 +/- 0.27 mm in the Firesorb BRS group and 0.18 +/- 0.37 mm in the CoCr-EES group (difference -0.01 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.07 to 0.06; p(noninferiority) < 0.0001) in the intention-to-treat population and was 0.17 +/- 0.27 mm in the Firesorb BRS group and 0.19 +/- 0.37 mm in the CoCr-EES group (difference -0.005 mm; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.06; p(noninferiority) < 0.0001) in the per-protocol set. The proportion of covered struts was 99.3% in the Firesorb BRS group and 98.8% in the CoCr-EES group (difference 0.8%; 95% CI: -0.5% to 2.1%; p(noninferiority) < 0.0001; p(superiority) = 0.21). One-year clinical outcomes were similar between groups.CONCLUSIONS The thinner strut Firesorb BRS was noninferior to the CoCr-EES for the primary endpoint of 1-year angiographic in-segment LL and the key secondary endpoint of 1-year proportion of covered struts by optical coherence tomography. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
更多
查看译文
关键词
bioresorbable scaffold,coronary artery disease,optical coherence tomography,percutaneous coronary intervention
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要