A Randomized Evaluation Of The Triguard (Tm) Hdh Cerebral Embolic Protection Device To Reduce The Impact Of Cerebral Embolic Lesions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implan Tation: The Reflect I Trial

Aims The REFLECT I trial investigated the safety and effectiveness of the TriGuard (TM) HDH (TG) cerebral embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacementMethods and results This prospective, multicentre, single-blind, 2:1 randomized (TG vs. no TG) study aimed to enrol up to 375 patients, including up to 90 roll-in patients. The primary combined safety endpoint (VARC-2 defined early safety) at 30 days was compared with a performance goat. The primary efficacy endpoint was a hierarchical composite of (i) all-cause mortality or any stroke at 30days, (ii) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) worsening at 2-5 days or Montreal Cognitive Assessment worsening at 30days, and (iii) total volume of cerebral ischaemic lesions detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 2-5 days. Cumulative scores were compared between treatment groups using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method. A total of 258 of the planned, 375 patients (68.8%) were enrolled (54 roll-in and 204 randomized). The primary safety outcome was met compared with the performance goal (21.8% vs. 35%, P < 0.0001). The primary hierarchical efficacy endpoint was not met (mean efficacy score, higher is better: -5.3 +/- 99.8 TG vs. 11.8 +/- 96.4 control, P = 0.31). Covert central nervous system injury was numerically lower with TG both in-hospital (46.1% vs. 60.3%, P = 0.0698) and at 5 days (61.7 vs. 76.2%, P = 0.054) compared with controls.Conclusion REFLECT I demonstrated that TG cerebral protection during TAVR was safe in comparison with historical TAVR data but did not meet the predefined effectiveness endpoint compared with unprotected TAVR controls.[GRAPHICS].