Comparing Hydrate-Based Method With Freezing/Thawing Method For Chromium Hydroxide Sulfate Removal Close To The Melting Point Of Ice

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY(2021)

引用 10|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
In this work, both freezing/thawing method and hydrate-based method for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal with the temperature closing to melting point of ice have been conducted and compared in consideration of stirring speed, freezing time (or hydration-time), temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration. The results suggested that chromium hydroxide sulfate removal efficiency of 93.9% was optimal with 85.6% of yield of melted water for freezing/thawing method. However, optimal chromium hydroxide sulfate removal efficiency and yield of melted water was 71.2% and 53.4% for hydrate-based method respectively. The optimal temperature for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal was different between the freezing/thawing method and the hydrate-based method. The optimal stirring speed freezing time, temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration for freezing/thawing method were 800 r/min, 3 h, 271.6 K, and 100 ppm, respectively. However, the optimal stirring speed, hydration time, temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration for hydrate-based method were 400 r/min, 1 h, 271.1 K, and 100 ppm, respectively. The results also suggested that the freezing/thawing method seems to be more effective than the hydrate-based method at 5.50 MPa for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal at the same temperature in this work. Therefore, the freezing/ thawing method should be the first choice to remove chromium hydroxide sulfate at the temperature ranged from 269.2 K to 271.2 K when the concentration of chromium hydroxide sulfate was less than 800 ppm.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Heavy metal, Hydrate, Freeze, Separation, Waste water, Removal
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要