Chest CT Diagnosis of COVID-19: Accuracy using CO-RADS and CT-Involvement Scoring

JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY(2021)

引用 4|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives: Both Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT-involvement scores (CTIS) have been proposed for evaluation of COVID-19 on chest CT. The purpose of this single-center, retrospective study was to evaluate both scoring systems to diagnose COVID-19 infection in a high-prevalence area. Materials and Methods: Chest CT datasets (n = 200) and available reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on nasopharyngeal swab were included. CT scans were assigned to four 'imaging groups' after scoring for both CO-RADS and CTIS. Diagnostic accuracy of chest CT was calculated respectively using RT-PCR and clinical diagnosis as gold standards: False-negatives and false-positives of chest CT regarding RT-PCR were studied in more depth using the medical files. Results: The 'imaging group' including CO-RADS 4/5 scores reached the highest diagnostic values for COVID-19 considering either the initial RT-PCR or the final clinical diagnosis as the standard of reference: accuracies of 172/200 (86%) to 181/200 (90.5%), sensitivities of 60/80 (88.2%) to 70/79 (88.6%), specificities of 112/132 (84.9%) to 111/121 (91.7%), negative predictive values (NPV) of 112/120 (93.3%) to 111/120 (92.5%), respectively. False-negative CTs regarding RT-PCR were mainly explained by imaging very early in the disease course (5 out of 8 cases) or COVID-19 infection with no/minor respiratory symptoms (3 out of 8 cases). Conclusion: Assessing chest CT using CO-RADS is a valuable diagnostic approach for COVID-19 infection in a high-prevalence area, with a higher accuracy than CTIS.
更多
查看译文
关键词
COVID-19, CT, RT-PCR, CO-RADS, Chest, Infection
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要