Papillary and Medullary Thyroid Carcinomas Presenting as Collision Tumors: A Case Series of 21 Cases at a Tertiary Care Cancer Center

Collision tumor is the occurrence of two histologically and morphologically distinct tumors within the same organ with no histological admixture. Collision tumors of the thyroid are extremely rare constituting < 1% of all thyroid tumors. Clinical profiles and pathological features of Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) presenting as Collision tumors of thyroid, diagnosed between 2009 and 2019, at a tertiary care cancer center were retrospectively analyzed. Collision tumors comprised 4.7% of all MTC cases diagnosed over 10 years. A total of 21 cases (11males, 11 females, M:F = 1) were retrieved with the mean age of patients being 45.33 years (range 26–77 years). More than half of PTCs involved the right lobe of the thyroid (66.6%). About half (53.4%) of MTCs affected the left lobe. Imaging done pre-operatively failed to identify the smaller second tumor in 60% of the cases with both tumours in separate lobes. Pre-operative FNAC showed only MTC in all 8 cases in which it was done. Papillary microcarcinoma (m-PTC) was seen in 85.7% cases, with one case of multifocal m-PTC. MTC (mean size 3.12 cm), on an average, was 3 times larger than the PTC (mean size 0.91 cm). The histological variants of MTC included-oncocytic (1/21, 4.7%), spindle cell (1/21, 4.7%), epithelial (3/21, 14.2%) and classical (16/21, 76.2%) and of PTC included classic PTC (12/21, 57.14%), Hurthle cell (2/21, 9.52%), tall cell (1/21, 4.76%) and follicular variant of PTC (6/21, 28.57%). The microscopic extrathyroidal extension (ETE) due to MTC and PTC component was 42.8% and 9.5% respectively. Lymph node metastasis was seen in 16 (76.2%) cases; 87.5% (14/16) of which were contributed by MTC, 12.5% (2/16) by PTC alone, and 12.5% (2/16) cases showed metastasis from both MTC and PTC. MTC had a higher stage than PTC in 85.5% of cases. Collision tumors of the thyroid are exceedingly rare, and possibly underdiagnosed due to variation in sampling techniques, especially of the grossly “normal lobe”. The low incidence in our cohort is in favor of the “Chance theory” of co-occurrence. This diagnosis is important due to its therapeutic and prognostic implications.