Understanding Occipital And Parietal Contributions To Visual Working Memory: Commentary On Xu (2020)

In her commentary, Xu [2020. Revisit once more the sensory storage account of visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 28(5-8), 433-446] admonishes the reader that "To have a full understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying VWM [visual working memory], both behavioral and neural evidence needs to be taken into account. This is a must, and not a choice, for any study that attempts to capture the nature of VWM" (p. 11). Although we don't disagree with this statement, our overall assessment of this commentary is that it, itself, fails to satisfy several "musts" and, consequently, does not pose a serious challenge for the sensory recruitment framework for understanding visual working memory. These "musts" include accurately characterizing the framework being critiqued, not favouring verbal models and intuition at the expense of formal quantitative models, and providing even-handed interpretation of the work of others. We'll conclude with a summary of how the sensory recruitment framework can be incorporated into a broader working model of visual working memory.