Respiratory Distress Syndrome And Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia After Fetal Growth Restriction: Lessons From A Natural Experiment In Identical Twins

Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is thought to negatively affect lung development resulting in increased respiratory morbidity. However, research performed in singletons is often limited by a certain level of bias caused by individual differences in genetic constitution, obstetrical and maternal factors.Methods: Respiratory morbidity was compared between the smaller and the larger twin in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), defined as a birth weight discordance >= 20%, born in our center between 2010 and 2019 in this retrospective study. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) was diagnosed based on the clinical picture of a neonate with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and/or surfactant, confirmed by a chest X-ray. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was diagnosed when the neonate required treatment with >21% oxygen for at least 28 days.Findings: Median gestational age at birth for the 94 included pregnancies was 32.4 (IQR 30.4-34.3) weeks. Within-pair analyses showed that the prevalence of RDS was lower in the smaller twin compared to the larger twin, 19.1% (18/94) vs 34.0% (32/94), respectively (p = 0.004). The odds of RDS for the larger twin was doubled (OR 2.1 (CI95% 1.3-3.5). In contrast, the rate of BPD in the smaller twin was higher as opposed to the larger twin, 16.7% (15/90) vs 6.7% (6/89), respectively (p = 0.008), with a more than doubled odds (OR 2.5 (CI95% 1.3-4.9)).Interpretation: Despite being genetically identical, sFGR twins have different respiratory outcomes. Adverse growth condition in utero in the smaller twin is associated with a reduced odds of RDS at birth but a more than doubled odds of BPD, reflecting the pathophysiologic adverse effect of growth restriction on lung development. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.