The combined application of the contrast-to-noise index and 80 kVp for cardiac CTA scanning before atrial fibrillation ablation reduces radiation dose exposure.

INTRODUCTION:To compare the radiation dose, diagnostic accuracy, and the resultant ablation procedures using 80 and 120-kVp cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) protocols with the same contrast-to-noise ratio in patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS:This retrospective study was performed following institutional review board approval. We divided 140 consecutive patients who had undergone CCTA using a 64-MDCT scanner into two equal groups. Standard deviation (SD) of the CT number was set at 25 Hounsfield units (HU) for the 120-kVp protocol. To facilitate a reduction in radiation dose it was set at 40 HU for the 80 kVp protocol. We compared the two protocols with respect to the radiation dose, the diagnostic accuracy for detecting left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi, matching for surface registration, and the resultant ablation procedures. RESULTS:At 120 kVp, the dose length product (DLP) was 2.2 times that at 80 kVp (1269.0 vs 559.0 mGy cm, p < 0.01). The diagnostic accuracy for thrombus detection was 100% using both protocols. There was no difference between the two protocols with respect to matching for surface registration. The protocols did not differ with respect to the subsequent time required for the ablation procedures and the ablation fluoroscopy time, and the radiation dose (p = 0.54, 0.33, and 0.32, respectively). CONCLUSION:For the same CNR, the DLP at 80 kVp (559.0 mGy cm) was 56% of that delivered at 120 kVp (1269.0 mGy cm). There was no reduction in diagnostic accuracy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:Maintaining CNR allows for a reduction in the radiation dose without reducing the image quality.