Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis Long-term Outcomes From the Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA SURGERY(2021)

引用 34|浏览35
暂无评分
摘要
IMPORTANCE Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, with significant morbidity. Short-term results from randomized clinical trials have indicated that laparoscopic lavage is a feasible alternative to resection. However, it appears that no long-term results are available. OBJECTIVE To compare long-term (5-year) outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and primary resection as treatments of perforated purulent diverticulitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This international multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 21 hospitals in Sweden and Norway, which enrolled patients between February 2010 and June 2014. Long-term follow-upwas conducted between March 2018 and November 2019. Patients with symptoms of left-sided acute perforated diverticulitis, indicating urgent surgical need and computed tomography-verified free air, were eligible. Those available for trial intervention (Hinchey stages 更多
查看译文
关键词
acute perforated diverticulitis,primary resection
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要