Clinical And Patho-Genomic Characteristics Of Concomitant Mutated Status Of Tp53, Egfr, Kras Genes In Chinese Patients With Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma.

e21024 Background: Alterations of TP53, EGFR, KRAS genes are of importance in LUAD etiology, vital prognostic markers as well as therapeutic targets as recently reported. In addition, in advanced or metastatic NSCLC, concomitant mutations of TP53 with EGFR or KRAS closely associated with prognosis and TKIs’ efficacy. While, distribution of concomitant mutations of TP53, EGFR and KRAS in early stage or resectable LUAD remained to be elucidated. Methods: 434 patients with defined pathological diagnosis of LUAD were recruited from 1st.Jan.2019-31st.Dec.2019, which made 468 FFPE blocks for the study. Histology and composition were given by authorized by pathologist. Genomic DNA from FFPE samples and peripheral blood was extracted. 636 cancer-related genes were specifically captured and sequenced by MGI-seq 2000. Association of concomitant status with clinical and genomic characteristics was further analyzed. Results: Generally, TP53, EGFR and KRAS mutation rate is 26.7%, 60.9% and 10% respectively. Among these samples, Subtypes of EGFR mutations significantly differed in between tumors rising in left and right lung (P = 0.048). Tumors with KRAS mutations occurred more easily in right lung than those with TP53 or EGFR mutations (P = 0.012, P = 0.043 respectively). In addition, histology subtype and clinical stage were closely associated with TP53, EGFR and KRAS mutation status (P < 0.001). 90 samples (19.2%) carried concomitant TP53 and EGFR mutation, 14 samples (3%) were TP53/KRAS co-mutated. LUAD samples with EGFR amplification had higher rate of concomitant TP53/EGFR mutations (RR:1.1,95%CI: 1.032 to 1.159,P = 0.0009). Moreover, KRAS G13 mutated samples more easily co-mutated with TP53 mutations compared with those with mutations in G12 loci (RR:1.33,95%CI: 1.24 to 1.37,P = 0.024). Further, samples with non-concomitant TP53 mutations had highest level of tumor mutation burden (muts/Mb) (median TMB = 9.74 vs 2.05 for TP53/EGFR/KRAS wild type, P < 0.0001). Samples with concomitant TP53/EGFR mutations and TP53/KRAS mutations displayed higher TMB level than their non-concomitant compartment (P < 0.001 and P = 0.05 respectively). Conclusions: TP53,EGFR and KRAS mutations and their concomitant mutation status displayed diverse correlation with spatial, clinical and genomic characteristics in resectable LUAD patients. This correlation may indicate complex biological heterogeneity of LUAD which may need further exploration.