Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study.

Jian Fan,Fei Yu, Xiang Wang,Qianda Zou, Bin Lou,Guoliang Xie, Xianzhi Yang,Weizhen Chen, Qi Wang,Dan Zhang, Ruonan Wang,Baihuan Feng, Yuejiao Dong,Li Huang, Yun Teng, Zhenzhen Deng,Ling Yu, Kaijin Xu,Jifang Sheng, Shufa Zheng,Yu Chen

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry(2020)

引用 28|浏览93
暂无评分
摘要
To clarify the effect of different respiratory sample types on SARS-CoV-2 detection, we collected throat swabs, nasal swabs and hock-a-loogie saliva or sputum, and compared their detection rates and viral loads. The detection rates of sputum (95.65%, 22/23) and hock-a-loogie saliva (88.09%, 37/42) were significantly higher than those in throat swabs (41.54%, 27/65) and nasal swabs (72.31%, 47/65) (P < 0.001). The Ct Values of sputum, hock-a-loogie saliva and nasal swabs were significantly higher than that in throat swabs, whereas no significant difference was observed between sputum and saliva samples. Hock-a-loogie saliva are reliable sample types that can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2, and worthy of clinical promotion.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要