Computational planning of the synthesis of complex natural products

Training algorithms to computationally plan multistep organic syntheses has been a challenge for more than 50 years 1 – 7 . However, the field has progressed greatly since the development of early programs such as LHASA 1 , 7 , for which reaction choices at each step were made by human operators. Multiple software platforms 6 , 8 – 14 are now capable of completely autonomous planning. But these programs ‘think’ only one step at a time and have so far been limited to relatively simple targets, the syntheses of which could arguably be designed by human chemists within minutes, without the help of a computer. Furthermore, no algorithm has yet been able to design plausible routes to complex natural products, for which much more far-sighted, multistep planning is necessary 15 , 16 and closely related literature precedents cannot be relied on. Here we demonstrate that such computational synthesis planning is possible, provided that the program’s knowledge of organic chemistry and data-based artificial intelligence routines are augmented with causal relationships 17 , 18 , allowing it to ‘strategize’ over multiple synthetic steps. Using a Turing-like test administered to synthesis experts, we show that the routes designed by such a program are largely indistinguishable from those designed by humans. We also successfully validated three computer-designed syntheses of natural products in the laboratory. Taken together, these results indicate that expert-level automated synthetic planning is feasible, pending continued improvements to the reaction knowledge base and further code optimization.