Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure Versus Urine Flow Rate–Guided Hydration in Preventing Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

OBJECTIVES This study compared left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)-guided and urine flow rate (UFR)guided hydration. BACKGROUND Tailored hydration regimens improve the prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). METHODS Between July 15, 2015, and June 6, 2019, patients at high risk for CA-AKI scheduled for coronary and peripheral procedures were randomized to 2 groups: 1) normal saline infusion rate adjusted according to the LVEDP (LVEDPguided group); and 2) hydration controlled by the RenalGuard System in order to reach UFR .300 ml/h (UFR-guided group). The primary endpoint was the composite of CA-AKI (i.e., serum creatinine increase .25% or .0.5 mg/dl at 48 h) and acute pulmonary edema (PE). Major adverse events (all-cause death, renal failure requiring dialysis, PE, and sustained kidney injury) at 1 month were assessed. RESULTS The primary endpoint occurred in 20 of 351 (5.7%) patients in the UFR-guided group and in 36 of 351 (10.3%) patients in the LVEDP-guided group (relative risk [RR]: 0.560; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.390 to 0.790; p = 0.036). CA-AKI and PE rates in the UFR-guided group and LVEDP-guided group were 5.7% and 10.0% (RR: 0.570; 95% CI: 0.300 to 0.960; p = 0.048), and, respectively, 0.3% and 2.0% (RR: 0.070; 95% CI: 0.020 to 1.160; p = 0.069). Three patients in the UFR-guided group experienced complications related to the Foley catheter. Hypokalemia rate was 6.2% in the UFR-guided group and 2.3% in the LVEDP-guided group (p = 0.013). The 1-month major adverse events rate was 7.1% in the UFR-guided group and 12.0% in the LVEDP-guided group (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates that UFR-guided hydration is superior to LVEDP-guided hydration to prevent the composite of CA-AKI and PE. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2020;13:2065-74) (c) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.