Antithrombotic Strategies In Patients Needing Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background The optimal antithrombotic regimen in patients with a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAT) presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Objectives To perform a network meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different antithrombotic regimens among patients with ACS or undergoing PCI requiring OAT. Methods Network meta-analysis was performed in a frequentist framework. Antithrombotic regimens were categorized by OAC type (vitamin K antagonist-based [VKA]; non-VKA OAT [NOAC]) and antiplatelet agents (P2Y inhibitor only: dual therapy [DAT]; P2Y plus aspirin: triple therapy [TAT]). Safety outcomes were Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Efficacy outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and stent-thrombosis (ST). Results Five RCTs were included, encompassing 10,797 patients (atrial fibrillation 69-100%, ACS 28-62%, PCI 77-100%). Both VKA and NOAC-based DAT regimens reduced the occurrence of TIMI major bleeding compared to VKA TAT (VKA DAT: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.98; NOAC DAT: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70). Nevertheless, only NOAC DAT significantly reduced the occurrence of ICH compared to VKA TAT (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.64). Ischemic outcomes were similar among the four treatment regimens. However, numerical, potentially clinically important, higher ST occurrence was observed for NOAC DAT as compared to both VKA TAT (1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.33) and NOAC TAT (1.86, 95% CI 0.93-3.73). Conclusion DAT regimens present the highest safety profile among antithrombotic strategies, with a NOAC-specific impact on ICH reduction. NOAC DAT might entail clinically important higher ST occurrence, warranting a case-by-case comprehensive evaluation that integrates patient- and procedure-related residual ischemic risk with the patient-specific bleeding risk.