Quality Of Life And Satisfaction Among Physicians After Wavefront-Optimized Vs Topography-Guided Laser Vision Correction

Purpose: To assess satisfaction, quality of life, occupational impact, and clinical outcomes of physicians who have undergone laser vision correction (LVC) using either wavefront-optimized (WFO) or topography-guided (TG) excimer laser ablation profile with femtosecond laser flap creation.Setting: Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.Design: Retrospective survey study.Methods: A 12-question survey was sent to all physicians who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy at the Cole Eye Institute between 2011 and 2018 on the WaveLight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q Laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). Visual outcomes were obtained from patient charts.Results: Two hundred thirty-five physicians (454 eyes) met the study's inclusion criteria, including 181 physicians (353 eyes) who underwent WFO LVC and 54 physicians (101 eyes) who underwent TG LVC. One hundred seventeen physicians (49.8%) responded to the survey and reported an overall satisfaction rate of 98.3% among all physicians receiving LVC with 96.6% reporting they would have the procedure again. Visual outcomes showed a high level of surgical predictability, efficacy, and safety among WFO and TG eyes, with a higher percentage of eyes that received TG ablation achieving 20/10 vision (22% vs 4%, P < .0001) and 20/15 vision (87% vs 69%, P < .01) when compared with WFO eyes.Conclusions: Physicians who had undergone LVC with either WFO or TG excimer laser ablation reported high satisfaction and quality-of-life improvements. Both groups achieved excellent visual outcomes, with a higher percentage of TG eyes achieving 20/10 and 20/15 vision. Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS