Survival and risk factors in patients with liposarcoma with distant metastasis.

BACKGROUND:The distant metastasis in liposarcoma is not thoroughly investigated. Based on a large cohort, we attempted to evaluate the survival in liposarcoma patients with distant metastasis and to reveal the risk factors. METHODS:The records of liposarcoma patients with or without distant metastasis were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database from 2010 to 2016. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox hazard regression was scheduled to investigate prognostic factors for liposarcoma patients with distant metastasis. Risk factors for metastasis were identified by the logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:A total of 227 liposarcomas with distant metastasis were identified in 4,181 patients. The 5-year survival rate for patients with and without metastasis was 12.1% (95% CI: 5.0%-19.0%) and 75.4% (95% CI: 73.6%-77.2%), respectively. Age ≥60 years (HR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.11-2.69) and surgery (HR=0.26; 95% CI: 0.17-0.41) were independent prognostic factors for patients with metastasis. The annual incidence of distant metastasis was from 3.76% to 7.3%. Liposarcoma in trunk (OR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.02-2.79), myxoid type (OR=2.65; 95% CI: 1.16-6.05), grade III (OR=2.62; 95% CI: 1.17-5.88), grade IV (OR=4.07; 95% CI: 1.84-9.00), T2 stage (OR=2.71; 95% CI: 1.15-6.40), and N1 stage (OR=9.44; 95% CI: 4.63-19.26) were associated with the development of metastasis. Homogeneous and heterogeneous factors were found for patients with different metastatic organs. CONCLUSIONS:The survival was significantly dismal in liposarcoma patients with distant metastasis. The risk and prognostic factors provide a reference to clinical screening and prevention for distant metastasis in liposarcoma.