[IS IT APPROPRIATE TO CHANGE THE NAMES OF SURGICAL PROCEDURES AND EXAMINATIONS IN THE FIELD OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY WHICH GIVE EPONYMS DISTINCTION TO NAZI DOCTORS?]

The majority of the German medical institutions and nearly half of the clinicians during the Nazi regime provided unwavering support to the distorted Nazi views on health and disability. Leading physicians were an integral part of the atrocities carried out during that era, with some of them having a vital role in executing the ideology of the "final solution". The names of Carl Clauberg and Walter Stoeckel, two notable doctors in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, were also linked with the third Reich. Both of these physicians, collaborated, each in his own way, with the Nazi regime, which tainted their legacy indefinitely. The two received professional honor for their contribution to the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, which were unrelated to their Nazi past, after their names were linked in the form of eponyms to surgical procedures and examinations, which they developed. In recent years, as a consequence of their disturbing past, there are increasing arguments which call for erasing their eponyms from the medical lexicon. We, on the contrary, believe that the opposite is true and that maintaining these eponyms will actually enable teaching future generations and serve a dual educational role to both highlight professional and scientific achievements as well as serve as a mark of Cain and warning that professional achievements do not prevent ethical decline. Preserving the name will provide an educational opportunity to teach about the responsibilities that come with professional leadership, which these doctors abused carelessly, in order to prevent history from repeating itself.