Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus noninvasive NAVA in preterm neonates with apnea of prematurity: a pilot study with a novel approach

Kimberly Firestone, Bassel Al Horany, Laurence de Leon-Belden,Howard Stein

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY(2020)

引用 11|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Background Neonates with apnea of prematurity often fail CPAP because it does not provide adequate support during apnea. NAVA provides proportional ventilator support based on electrical activity of the diaphragm. When the NAVA level is 0 cmH 2 0/mcV, the patient receives minimal support above PEEP when breathing and backup ventilation when apneic. This study compares number of clinically significant events on CPAP versus noninvasive NAVA level 0. Methods Retrospective study of preterm neonates having apnea of prematurity on nasal CPAP. Patients were then placed on NAVA level 0. The number of events on each mode was collected. Statistics were paired t -test. Results Seventeen subjects with gestational age 26.1 ± 1.7 weeks, study age 19.5 ± 12.5 days. Events decreased from 17.9 ± 7.8 on CPAP to 10.2 ± 8.1 events on NAVA level 0 ( p = 0.00047). Conclusions NAVA level 0 reduced the number of clinically significant events compared with CPAP in premature neonates with apnea of prematurity.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Outcomes research,Paediatrics,Medicine/Public Health,general,Pediatrics,Pediatric Surgery
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要