Disambiguating Requirements Through Syntax-Driven Semantic Analysis of Information Types.

Context and motivation] Several state laws and app markets, such as Google Play, require the disclosure of app data practices to users. These data practices constitute critical privacy requirements statements, since they underpin the app's functionality while describing how various personal information types are collected, used, and with whom they are shared. [Question/Problem] When such statements contain abstract terminology referring to information types (e.g., "we collect your device information"), the statements can become ambiguous and thus reduce shared understanding among app developers, policy writers and users. [Principle Ideas/Results] To overcome this obstacle, we propose a syntax-driven method to infer semantic relations from a given information type. We use the inferred relations from a set of information types (i.e. lexicon) to populate a partial ontology. The ontology is a knowledge graph that can be used to guide requirements authors in the selection of the most appropriate information type terms. [Contributions] Our method employs a shallow typology to categorize individual words in an information type, which are then used to discharge production rules in a context-free grammar (CFG). The CFG is augmented with semantic attachments that are used to generate the semantic relations. This method is evaluated on 1,853 unique information types from 30 privacy policies to yield 0.99 precision and 0.91 recall when compared to human interpretation of the same information types.