Mitral and aortic paravalvular leaks closure: Insights from the prospective international multicenter FFPP cohort study

Sébastien Hascoët,Grzegorz Smolka, D. Champagnac,Eric Brochet, Fabrice Bauer,Rémy Pillière,Yoan Lavie-Badie,Mohammed Nejjari, Guillaume Leurent, Christian Spaulding,Nicolas Combes, L. Mangin,Nadjib Hammoudi, Claire Dauphin, Adel Aminian,V. Ciobotaru, Hélène Bouvaist, Xavier Iriart,Sébastien Armero, B. Gerardin

Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements(2020)

引用 0|浏览80
暂无评分
摘要
Background Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure (PVLc) has emerged as an alternative to surgery. It remains a technically challenging procedure. We aim to compare outcomes after mitral and aortic PVLc. Methods We analyzed data from PVLc procedures performed over the 2 first years of inclusion in the FFPP (Fermeture de Fuite Periprothetique) study, a prospective observational industry-independent cohort study which started in January 2017. Results We analyzed 147 PVLc (99 mitral–48 aortic), performed in 127 patients (1 procedure in 109 patients, 2 in 16 and 3 in 2) included in 22 centers among 3 countries (France, Poland and Belgium). Age (69 ± 10 versus 69 ± 11 yo), left ventricular ejection fraction (56 versus 51%), Euroscore2 (9 versus 7.6) and rate of mechanical valve (56.7% versus 41.7%, P = 0.1) were not significantly different among mitral and aortic groups. All patients had heart failure and/or hemolytic anemia. Hemolysis was more common in mitral PVL (62 versus 43%, P = 0.04). A mean of 1.4 (min 1, max 3) and 1.8 (min 1 max 5) devices were respectively required for technically successful aortic and mitral PVLc. No complication was reported in procedures with failure of device implantation. Aortic PVLc were faster than mitral PVLc (1h18 versus 2h20), with a trend towards a higher rate of technical success (96% versus 87%, P = 0.1) and fewer rate of major adverse events (worsening hemolysis, stroke, life threatening events and deaths; 2% versus 14%, P = 0.02). At 1 month follow-up, events were reported in 2% of patients (blood transfusion for hemolysis) versus 26.2% (deaths 3.3%; hemolysis 14.8%; heart failure 3.3%; heart failure and hemolysis 4.9%) after successful aortic and mitral PVLc respectively, P = 0.6. Conclusion Mitral PVLc is a more complex procedure than aortic PVLc, with a lower success rate and a higher risk of peri-procedural and one-month severe adverse events. Longer follow-up data are expected and will be available from this on-going study.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要