Comparison Of A Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Using Rass And Four

ObjectiveICU severity scores such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) determine neurologic dysfunction based on the Glasgow Coma Scale, a tool that may be limited in a critically ill population. It remains unknown whether alternative methods to assess for neurologic dysfunction, such as FOUR and RASS, are superior. This study aimed to determine the predictive performance of a modified SOFA tool in a large Brazilian ICU cohort.DesignProspective cohort single center study.SettingMixed surgical and medical ICU in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil between August 2015 and December 2018.PatientsAll acutely ill ICU admissions, other than postoperative patients or those with insufficient data, were eligible for study inclusion.Measurements and main results2147 patients were admitted to the ICU, of which 999 meeting inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis with a median age of 72 years (IQR 58-83) and a female predominance 545 (54%). The SOFA score using GCS, RASS and FOUR for the neurologic component performed marginally in the ability to predict general ICU mortality (SOFA(GCS) AUC 0.74 vs SOFA(RASS) AUC 0.71 and SOFA(FOUR) AUC 0.67), with SOFA(FOUR) performing significantly lower compared to either SOFA(RASS) and SOFA(GCS) (p<0.04, p<0.004 respectively). All three scores demonstrated decreased discriminate function in the mechanically ventilated population (SOFA(GCS) AUC 0.70 vs SOFA(RASS) AUC 0.70 and SOFA(FOUR) AUC 0.55), though SOFA(FOUR) remained significantly worse when compared to SOFA(GCS) or SOFA(RASS) (p = 0.034, p = 0.014, respectively).. Furthermore, performance was poor in a subset of patients with sepsis (n = 145) at time of admission (SOFA(GCS) AUC 0.66 vs SOFA(RASS) AUC 0.55 and SOFA(FOUR) AUC 0.56).ConclusionModification of the neurologic component in the SOFA score does not appear to improve mortality prediction in the ICU.