Different Types of Syncope Presenting to Clinic: Do We Miss Cardiac Syncope?

Heart, Lung and Circulation(2020)

引用 2|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Background In the outpatient setting, differentiation of cardiac syncope (CS) from other more common forms of syncope is difficult, particularly in the elderly. We examined the frequency of the different types of syncope in a clinic population and estimated missed CS cases. Methods We retrospectively examined the relevant data for patients assessed in our Christchurch Hospital syncope clinic over a 5-year study period (1 January 2011-31 December 2015). Patients who were later found to have cardiac syncope (and were not initially diagnosed in our clinic) were counted as "missed" cases. Results Eight hundred thirty-nine (839) patients (median age 57, interquartile range: 35-73 years, 56% female) were assessed during the study period. Vasovagal syncope (VVS) was the most frequent diagnosis (42.8%) followed by drug-related postural hypotension (DRPH) (26.6%). Cardiac syncope was initially diagnosed in only 3.1%. Of 30 CS patients initially assessed in syncope clinic who later required pacing, 18 (2.1%) were missed CS. In this group, 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG) was normal in 50% and the majority (n=10) were tilt-positive. The 2.5-year mortality was 5.7% (n=48) including three sudden unexpected cardiac deaths. Conclusion Vasovagal syncope and DRPH were by far the most frequent diagnoses. Cardiac syncope was less frequent because patients were selected mainly from an outpatient population, not the emergency department. In a small number of patients, CS was missed for the following reasons: (1) coexistence of cardiac conduction system disease with VVS and DRPH in the elderly, and (2) insensitivity of 12-lead ECG, in-hospital telemetry and out-of-hospital Holter monitoring for detecting conduction system disease early in its development.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Cardiac syncope,Orthostatic hypotension,Syncope clinic,Pacemaker,Vasovagal syncope
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要